Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Almost exactly the tactic and politics Israel uses. If there's violent conflict, the lesser power is 'terrorist' and this justifies the use of greater militaristic power to squelch the rebellion. If there's no violent conflict the greater power continues to push into the area it wants and plays coy with the politics for recognizing the other state's legitimacy.


why was the above voted down? what's wrong with the parallel with Israel's settlement policy?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: