Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The only way to make money is to be able to mine more than your costs. A small USB ASIC miner is now around $30-40 for 330 Mhash/sec and the 2-3Ghash/sec USB models are ~$200 on ebay. You'd have to make more than that much money with your mining. At current exchange rates, you can make about 50-75 cents a week with a 330 Mhash/sec miner. That would require 40-60 weeks to pay back the costs. And that's not counting the electricity that you're using, which is small, but is probably more than 50 cents a week in some areas of the country. And that also doesn't then into account the expected drops in mining rewards.

At some point when you are scaling, your costs are lower than your expected income. You have to be doing this at scale in order to break even, let alone make money. And, if you have a sufficiently large setup, you aren't talking about mining in pools, you have your own pool, where you keep the rewards for each mined block.

Little guys mining get minuscule rewards for negligible costs. You aren't going to make any significant money with it.

Source: I've been running a 330Mhash/sec USB ASIC miner for the past two weeks :) I'm a total newbie, but the economics of it aren't good.



When people calculate the economics of mining they inevitably forget to take into consideration the future value of the coins they are mining.


Because they shouldn't. If you want to speculate on BTC, just buy it. If the cost to mine each BTC today is higher than the cost to buy it today then mining doesn't make sense regardless of future price.


the real economics of buying Bitcoin mining rigs should be as follows:

If the cost of the mining unit will buy more BTC than it will generate, just buy the bitcoin. So a 2.2ghash miner (e.g. Blue/Red Fury from BPM) will generate 0.1BTC over 6 months. That miner would cost you approx $280. That would buy you 0.35BTC at a price of $800 per BTC.

There is obviously a point at which these would be economical to buy but that price point is less than $80, which is just over a quarter of their current price and that is probably close to what the manufacturer is paying for the production of them (including chip costs etc).

Source - I resell a lot of mining equipment on ebay, I charge approx 2 - 3 times what I pay for the units in bitcoin and i sell out of stock usually within 48-96 hours.

Now it may be that obtaining bitcoins is more difficult that obtaining mining equipment, or the fact that you can buy them on ebay (a site people are familiar with) as opposed to a site like localbitcoins (where people are not familiar with it and it requries sending money direct from your bank account) means people prefer to buy miners instead of BTC. The argument that coins will be worth more does not factor in as you can buy more coins now whoch will also be worth more.

Final point I would make on this is that mining has not been a profitable endeavour for most of bitcoins history. Anyone who mined from 2009 to late 2010/early 2011 will probably have done so at a loss, based ont he understanding that coins would be worth more later on down the road. The big difference however is that obtaining coins now is much easier than it was in 2009/10 if you are looking to obtain them without mining.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: