At the moment of writing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 MiMo V2.5 Pro had a lower cache hit ratio. From the article:
OSS models, depending on who you use them from, make a huge difference, mostly due to cache-hit rates.
Model Cheapest effectiveInputPrice (Provider) MiMo-V2.5-Pro 0.3720 (Xiaomi) DeepSeek V4 Pro (Max) 0.0560 (DeepSeek)
EDIT: okay I misread it, does this mean that DeepSeek reuses a higher percentage of tokens at cache price that MiMo, am I right?
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0.83% DeepSeek V4 Flash 2%
[0] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48317294#48317823 [1] https://openrouter.ai/docs/guides/features/response-caching#...
At the moment of writing https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48343690 MiMo V2.5 Pro had a lower cache hit ratio. From the article:
OSS models, depending on who you use them from, make a huge difference, mostly due to cache-hit rates.