Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

By definition, there is no such thing as AI art or generative art. All I can se in article are images.

Maybe we should focus more on how to use correct terms of why our language is changing?



By what definition? While I would say that arguing by definition is pretty pointless, here's one from Cambridge Dictionary:

> art (noun) - the making of objects, images, music, etc. that are beautiful or that express feelings

Gatekeeping the definition by excluding certain tools from being used in the creative process feels very silly to me.


This is vague definition. Does it mean that there is no ugly art? What is beautiful? How Ai could express feelings? How Ai give a purpose of making something thats come from deep life experience?



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: