Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I still remember when Google allegedly offered $200m for this business-less startup. I know I'm playing Monday morning QB, but to reject such offer simply demonstrates lack of economic judgement - both at the management and investor level (and a lucky strike for Google).

We tend to complain plenty about Wall Street's greed but this represents no different behaviour.



The danger of raising so much money - $41+ M - is that you risk being hold hostage by your investors.


This seems backwards. If you had invested significant sweat equity and then raised $41 million then perhaps so. But in this case it's more like you took your investors hostage and live in constant fear that they will escape.


I think Google (or Facebook) would have done well with their technology and people. Color is a great feature, to paraphrase Steve Jobs. Though maybe not a $200m feature.


You can develop a-lot of features and hire some (a-lot of) pretty fucking good people for $200m


There's something in the idea of ad hoc social networks. Someone will find some gold there eventually.


Google also, allegedly, offered GroupOn 6 billion.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: