Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>> US law has always relied on interpretation and precedent,

Isn't the key here that an interpretation sets the precedent, and then we don't get continual "reinterpretation"? That's what seems to be happening these days.



sure; the problem is ignoring precedence though, not judicial interpretation, which is a deliberate part of the process.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: