Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Apple Homekit certification is a good, easy label to recommend. It requires offline/LAN-only basic operation.


Apple Homekit certification is a good, easy label to recommend. It requires offline/LAN-only basic operation.

One of the overlooked features of the Apple Home app is its ability to firewall your IoT devices. If you have a compatible router:

Home Settings → Wi-Fi Network & Routers → HomeKit Accessory Security

The options are:

  Restrict to Home
  Automatic
  No Restriction
The Automatic setting only allows devices to talk to a manufacturer whitelist of connections for things like firmware updates. The other two options are self-evident.

I've found that "Restrict to Home" occasionally causes problems with older devices.


It’s rightfully overlooked now because HomeKit Secure Routers are basically dead.

I actually have a router that supports it, but I don’t dare turn it on because I have no confidence on it continuing to exist and the migration path back off it looks like a pain.


That's a shame. News article covering the apparent abandonment: https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/03/22/apple-has-abandon...


I wonder if things have changed since that article was published a year-and-half ago, because my eero, with the firmware from a few days ago, still supports it.


I assume it’s in some kind of maintenance support mode. Actually removing support from routers would be a nightmare for anyone who’s set up their home by pairing devices through a HomeKit router - all their HomeKit devices would become unpaired.


And it works very well with Home Assistant after the initial setup via an Apple device (needed so the device can connect to the desired wifi).


It's the right approach, but if only it was an open and cross-platform protocol.


Isn't that basically what the Matter protocol is?


Matter turned into a cluster fuck of devices. Use you're android phone to provision a device and connect it to your setup, most people use Google Home or homeassistant, smartthings is also an option, maybe others. But it's only to onboard the device for the most part. It'll still connect to your WiFi, give you next to no visibility as to what's going on in a failure and no interface to control it should your controller go down.

It's also not very well supported in things like homeassistant, despite what they say.


I’ve only got a handful of Matter devices, but haven’t experienced any problems with them. Have had them connected to HomeKit for a year or more, and got around to connecting them to Home Assistant last week - I was actually very impressed at how seamless it was to connect them to Home Assistant (generate pairing code in Apple Home, copy/paste into HA, done) - they’re now all directly connected to both HA and HomeKit and seem entirely functional on both.


I hoped so, I was wildly disappointed. In my experience so far Matter sucks just as much as what came before - unreliable connections, slow transfer, odd compatibility issues. The best IoT devices in my mind are still WiFi with HomeKit support - I can trivially block them at the router to keep them from phoning home.


Matter is that. However, version support varies by controller: some type of devices supported in one, but not in another. Multi-admin is supported, so that's good.


This. Not buying an Apple device just to set something up.


HomeKit certification doesn't mean that it can only be configured via Apple devices.


But it’s certified to support apple for lan mode and not necessarily something else, right?


I wouldn't recommend picking one that doesn't tell you what tools you can use to configure it, but that's a wise precaution regardless of HomeKit.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: