It's true that Engineering at times leads Science. But, from a scientific view, what's the point of a model if you can't understand it? After all, we already know how to create intelligence without understanding it.
While it's conceivable that intelligence is too complex for a human to ever understand (e.g. if not amenable to hierarchical decomposition), that would be very sad news for science.
While it's conceivable that intelligence is too complex for a human to ever understand (e.g. if not amenable to hierarchical decomposition), that would be very sad news for science.