How is separating money from government a valid point? Money is inextricably bound up with fundamental governmental issues including a monopoly over violence and the ability to levy taxes. Cryptocurrency might have some temporary utility for people physically stuck inside failed states like Venezuela but those situations are by nature unlikely to persist long term.
> How is separating money from government a valid point? Money is inextricably bound up with fundamental governmental issues including a monopoly over violence and the ability to levy taxes.
It looks like you've just answered your question right there.
> > How is separating money from government a valid point? Money is inextricably bound up with fundamental governmental issues including a monopoly over violence and the ability to levy taxes.
> It looks like you've just answered your question right there.
Eh... Yes, indeed they did. Only, not in the way it appears you thought they did: Look up the word “inextricably”. Yup, money can't be separated from government – if it could be, whoever now ran money in stead of the old government would in effect be the new government.
Hard to say if even trying is more evil than stupid or the other way around, vut that doesn't matter much, now does it?
