Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

From the article you’re commenting on:

One internal document described the business model by saying, "We want to make money when people use our devices, not when they buy our devices."

That plan never really materialized, though. It's not like Alexa plays ad breaks after you use it, so the hope was that people would buy things on Amazon via their voice. Not many people want to trust an AI with spending their money or buying an item without seeing a picture or reading reviews. The report says that by year four of the Alexa experiment, "Alexa was getting a billion interactions a week, but most of those conversations were trivial commands to play music or ask about the weather." Those questions aren't monetizable.



Why would they need to spend billions on validating that model though? Wouldn't it be enough to have just a 1000 or even 100 devices to test it?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: