Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Bingo, this my first response as well. What happens when users stop clicking through to content because it's being served up by Google, Bing or Yahoo?

I guess it could actually hurt them as well. If users aren't providing information back to the algorithm in the form of a click through related to a search term, don't the search engines also risk losing a key signal of relevance?



Why unilaterally assert this will decrease click-throughs?

If I see immediately relevant data for restaurant hours, movie times, a person's bio, etc, I'm far more likely to click-through and start looking at a menu, making a reservation, or getting more background.

They may well expect increased click-throughs leading to more site traffic for those who adopt.


For me this varies based on device. If I'm at my laptop then I'll usually click through, but if I'm on my phone I won't unless I have to.

It takes too long to render sites with loads of images and adverts on my phone, so I always dread clicking a search result.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: