It seems far more likely that Page is being evasive and doesn't want to give evidence supporting a narrative that Lewandowski was a superstar, Google was desperate to keep him, failed, and this lawsuit is just a malicious and anti-competitive. (Which I don't believe, but I'm guessing that's the narrative Uber would want to create)
I call bullshit. I don't care how big your company is. If some employee is getting $100M, the CEO is going to know about it. There couldn't be more than a handful of people at that company making that much.
I got the impression that he was aware of it, but had no reason to remember the specifics of it. He knew it sounded about right, which is what I'd expect from a CEO months (or years) after the fact.
Eh, there's definitely a limit, but if the maintainer of a major piece of software didn't remember how a particular feature first started or if they were in the OWNERS file of a particular directory, I would consider them to be a completely representative member of our species.
-He does not remember how Project Chauffeur was started.
-He does not know whether due diligence was done when Google made its investment in Uber.
-He does not know whether Waymo is allowed to file a lawsuit against Uber without notifying him.
What is he responsible for in Alphabet then?