A lot of your attacks seemed to be aimed at personal beliefs of some of the rust developers. I follow some on twitter and they may have some views people disagree with, but nothing exceedingly controversial.
Furthermore, all other criticisms you've mentioned specifically towards rust and the community of rust are literal opposites of everything I've experienced.
The community is friendly and helpful. Rust is extremely stable, both as code, and as far as the developers making sure to not break backwards compatibility, going as far as testing EVERY PROJECT available in crates.io for regressions. They are also extremely organized, having all discussions in well thought out and documented RFCs,and allowing all to give input on it all.
I don't know what problems you have with Rust. I'm sure there valid things to critize. But everything you mentioned is categorically false. If you disagree, I'd be open to see proof of it all.
Furthermore, all other criticisms you've mentioned specifically towards rust and the community of rust are literal opposites of everything I've experienced.
The community is friendly and helpful. Rust is extremely stable, both as code, and as far as the developers making sure to not break backwards compatibility, going as far as testing EVERY PROJECT available in crates.io for regressions. They are also extremely organized, having all discussions in well thought out and documented RFCs,and allowing all to give input on it all.
I don't know what problems you have with Rust. I'm sure there valid things to critize. But everything you mentioned is categorically false. If you disagree, I'd be open to see proof of it all.