Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not leading cause of suicide; leading cause of death. He's saying if this thing killed those two men, that's 1/320, which is (wayyy) more than poison (top 1 currently for 25-34, ~1/10000). You'd need to adjust for how many women actually take the pill; after a cursory glance a conservative estimate seems to be 10%, but please don't quote me on that.

http://www.worldlifeexpectancy.com/usa-cause-of-death-by-age...



I think my comment still applies. It's not reasonable to imagine that women would be subject to a male death/suicide rate by taking this drug. Gender has a larger effect on those rates than the drug likely does.


Can you reasonably separate them out when it's a drug that's specific to the gender?

I understand the point you're making, but your parent poster's reasoning sounds eminently reasonable to me.

The thing for men only to address a male problem exacerbates men's tendency to kill themselves?

"Yeah, but men kill themselves more often anyway" seems like the less reasonable argument.

I might be looking from a more... Emotionally involved perspective?




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2026 batch! Applications are open till July 27.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: