Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yes. For me, a startup is a new business formed to discover a new product or business model. Then once they've found that, they enter a phase of very rapid scaling. I'm ok with calling those startups as well, as they're still very learning-focused. But once they have a reasonably stable product and revenue stream, I think it's a mistake to call them startups any more. Their values and behaviors become much more like typical companies.


LivingSocial is not a startup, it's just a company that isn't doing very well right now. It's not in a "growth period", in fact it's already gone through this kind of firing before.

2014: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/capitalbusiness/livi...

2012: http://money.cnn.com/2012/11/29/technology/livingsocial-layo...

These guys even tried to recruit me last year. I declined politely due to the apparent 2-year lifespan their staff has.


In my opinion, at the point LivingSocial copied Groupon's business model, they weren't a startup anymore; before that they were a social app on Facebook.


You're only a startup if you have an entirely original business model? I don't agree with that definition.


I think it means, at the point in TIME when they became a groupon copy they where already past the "startup" phase.

Not that they stopped being a startup because they copied groupon

Crazy to see the downvote mafia around here on this kind of thing.


Hmm, you may be right. Definitely not how I read it at first.

In any event, I think they were a startup at that point in time, but I can see how reasonable people might disagree.


This may be a 'No true Scotsman'


No True Scotsman keeps moving the goal posts by endlessly revising the definitions of terms in a debate.

:)




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: