The intention of a law and how it enforced can be quite different. This law could be abused, I think that's the issue.
>> "People traveling through several countries to get to Denmark seeking asylum do have a choice. Many of them are men and left their family behind btw."
There's a reason the men are leaving their families behind. Travelling across Europe can be very dangerous - I'm sure some of the men who lost children to drowning off the coast of Greece wish they'd left their families behind. The men take the dangerous journey, get some shelter for their family in a new country, and then move the family there safely. Not all asylum seekers have had their homes destroyed/are at immediate risk of being killed. You would typically start trying to get out before your city is being bombed so it makes sense to leave your family in relative safety where they have shelter/food/a community to help them.
>> "muslims aren't even allowed to wear gold wedding rings."
Not all people seeking asylum in Europe at the minute are Muslim.
Denmark have no history of treating it's refugees or asylum seekers that way. They are just doing what Germany, Holland and Switzcherland is already doing. And you should turn it on it's head. The law was made to make sure people don't misuse the danish wellfare system. It's the same rule that apply to it's own citizens.
It is estimated that more than half of the refugees are economic immigrants/refugees not actually refugees. Sweeden is sending back up to 80.000 for exactly that reason. They aren't in any danger.
Claiming that it can be dangerous traveling across Europe is so absurd I don't even know what to say. Is it more dangerous than what they escaped? If thats the case why travel to Denmark? You are contradicting yourself.
Most people who seek asylum are actually muslims so yes.
Europe is more dangerous than living under ISIS?:) Well, looking at how things are going it might just be the case very soon. Back in the days before the collapse of Soviet Union there was an attempt by the party to turn the tide by claiming "to fix the socialism's shortcomings we need more socialism!". Now Europe is trying to fix refugees and ISIS problem by calling for "more refugees! more ISIS!"
The intention of a law and how it enforced can be quite different. This law could be abused, I think that's the issue.
>> "People traveling through several countries to get to Denmark seeking asylum do have a choice. Many of them are men and left their family behind btw."
There's a reason the men are leaving their families behind. Travelling across Europe can be very dangerous - I'm sure some of the men who lost children to drowning off the coast of Greece wish they'd left their families behind. The men take the dangerous journey, get some shelter for their family in a new country, and then move the family there safely. Not all asylum seekers have had their homes destroyed/are at immediate risk of being killed. You would typically start trying to get out before your city is being bombed so it makes sense to leave your family in relative safety where they have shelter/food/a community to help them.
>> "muslims aren't even allowed to wear gold wedding rings."
Not all people seeking asylum in Europe at the minute are Muslim.