Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | steezeburger's commentslogin

> Can't complain if I keep choosing hostile products for some convenience

Uh, yeah you can.


Especially if they're actively engaged in making it more and more difficult to escape their platforms: Google force-doxxing developers soon, banks & other charlatans not working on GrapheneOS because sEcUrItY, the list goes on.

Most people using this sort of rhetoric probably don't like black kids working in mines and yet they still use devices or cars built off of that produce.


It's the worst on iPhone, because it won't even let me scroll back up to show the button to open the tabs view, I have to switch out of the browser and re-open it to be able to scroll to show.

I think you can just tap the tab bar to bring the controls back. Works for me on whatever iOS this is before “Lucas would be proud with this numbering” 26.

Yikes, that shouldn't be possible.

Maybe you can two-finger pinch to shrink the web page to the grid view, then close the page from there?

https://www.wheresyoured.at/what-happens-if-openai-dies/#ant...

> I think it’s very unlikely this happens, and if it does, it would be ruinous for everybody involved.

The full snippet is in TFA.


hahahaah thank you, I asked too soon, realized later it was covered in there lol


I agree with you about the merits of journaling, but I think there is a place for this kind of app still. I don't use this specific app, but I like the idea of a single dumping ground that is sorted and reviewed by AI, but not necessarily for emotional journaling but for a form of data tracking. I mean I do sometimes track my emotions, but I don't ask AI to tell me how I'm doing, though I do ask it if there are any notes that keep popping up and they might be something I need to work on. It's also helpful for managing tasks as someone with ADHD. I don't have to think about sorting notes before I even write them. I still like to journal by hand. My note taking apps aren't replacements for them. They're more for research and data tracking really. I also think it is cool to have historical data around the things you do in general. And voice can be such a frictionless ux. Idk, I see the appeal!


I like the idea behind this a lot and feel the same way about my notes. I also built my own app for it and have a very similar feature on the roadmap. Cool stuff!


From the Github README:

> Dowe is a Rust compiler and runtime toolchain for building fullstack products from a unified, declarative source graph. Applications are authored in Dowe Source Format (.dowe), checked against explicit language and platform contracts, and lowered into the artifacts required by each selected target.


I have a similar idea in the note taking app I've written for myself over a couple years. I have a new daily page everyday with a simple but powerful tagging system. Adding automation soon that will be kick ass, but for now the mcp server plus Claude Code is pretty dang powerful. It's basically a clone of logseq with my own features. It's got templates and saved views and powerful filtering. It's been super useful for me personally. I need to update the README though. https://github.com/steezeburger/brainspread/


How in the world is this similar?


Every daily log is the same as the dirt notebook. It reduces friction when going to create a note because you don't have to think about where to file the note _before_ it's even written. I tag things and can sort them later, if I want, or not. Or can schedule things to loop back into my life (move to the current daily) if I choose. It's the exact same concept as their dirt notebook.

It's not a new concept. Bullet journal, logseq, zettelkasten, org-mode, etc are all inspiration


You mean it's better than the speechify cloud provided voices?


Correct. In my experience so far (2 days of usage across a couple dozen voices on speechify and then Kokoro) I've preferred the ones from Kokoro.


I find it hard to stay engaged doing this. I do get good results, but it's just hard to not get distracted when it's doing the work.


claude is so slow for interactive use like described, do people just run it in low effort mode or what?


I multi-task. While I’m waiting for Claude, I either check email or work with a different instance of Claude on a second problem


You can only check your email so many times, and you can only work on so many problems at once. You also generally have to be mindful of token consumption. I think it also leads to burnout to work on so much at once. I've been working this way for like a year.


This is why my favorite book is Thinking, Fast & Slow. It blew my mind and totally made me think about almost everything differently.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thinking,_Fast_and_Slow


The content on "priming" (significant pillar of the book) has collapsed as part of the reproducibility crisis in psychology. More here: https://replicationindex.com/2017/02/02/reconstruction-of-a-...


As someone who used priming heavily at Google, and its wide use in social networks to billions in revenue. I’m gonna go with the academics trying to take this down are BS.

Adam Curtis even suggests lightly that the takedown of priming in academia was paid for to bury its actual effectiveness (and liability by implication)


The reproducibility crisis reproducibility crisis?


It’s a paid research outcomes crisis as the root


priming obviously works. it is inherent in the physical structure of the brain. nerve endings from various all over the body terminate in different physical locations in the brain, and then these are interlinked in an adaptive biological mesh network. nerve responses are triggered by cascades of correlated impulses across different nerve endings, so at a physical level a strongly correlated signal from any two major nerve groups will trigger a sympathetic response when one of them fires independently. the experiments that social scientists come up with may be flawed, but this is definitely how my brain works, so i don't need a study to prove it.


Right it’s like saying hammers don’t work because at the quantum level we haven’t proven matters core structure.

Who cares the hammer still works.


Yes, there is a sort of blindness in science. The idea that if something hasn't been proven it's not true.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: