"if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree" yada yada

Well, monkeys are botanically speaking fish. Well, cladistically.

ray liotta laughing gif

That's not the way how human brain works.

I'm not getting it. OP said they are wary of letting the agent make choices for them, and outsourcing those choices lessens their understanding of them. They could interrogate the agent on why those choices were made until they have sufficient understanding, and they can also change the solution if they want to.

Same. If not for the required hardware refresh in our company I would have used it until it broke.

Or just don't put CPU limits: https://home.robusta.dev/blog/stop-using-cpu-limits

Yeah, that is mainly the point there. But difficult if company internal policies require it (for security, etc)

Are you arguing that copyleft is not open source?

From https://opensource.org/osd:

> 6. No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor > > The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor. For example, it may not restrict the program from being used in a business, or from being used for genetic research.

A non-commercial clause is a discrimination against a field of endeavor and thus non-open-source. The license cannot restrict how the user is able to *use* the software and still be open source. There can however be requirements to distribute the source code when distributing the software, ala GPL.

this is the original version: marksteve.com/dtmb