Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | geuis's commentslogin

Could someone (non-AI) summarize this? I'm sorry but I just literally don't have time to even read long posts from very reputable sources. I know I need the info but time just isn't there in my life right now.

Ronan Farrow and Andrew Marantz had a critical investigative report in The New Yorker on Sam Altman and OpenAI last month asking whether Altman could be trusted.

Paul Graham of Y-Combinator in response tweeted some positive things about Altman, emphasising that they didn't fire him as CEO of YC (though not going as far as declaring him trustworthy).

Now John Gruber of DaringFireball (an Apple blog) added context by claiming that YC owns a 0.6% stake in OpenAi, worth around $5bn, which might colour Graham's judgement.


Just skip and ignore if you don’t have the time, you likely have more important things to do

why non-AI? If AI is arguably great at something, it's this.

Doesn't this then open a market for "vpn style" apps that make everyone look broke? Get the lowest prices (ie market/baseline) on every interaction from food delivery to airplane tickets?

That then leads to a cat and mouse chase, and in the end the big corporations will win by forcing you to tie your real identity to your shopping identity, which won’t turn off enough consumers to meaningfully impact the bottom line.

The problem isn't really turning them off as much as it is people having no choice. There aren't too many supermarket chains. If one chain does this, rather than other chains undercutting them on price, they're going to do the same to maximize their profits. Most people only have one or two stores near their home. Some maybe have three. That doesn't leave a lot of options. And if you or your family is hungry, you won't drive around for hours, burning gas, until you find a shop that saves you a few bucks. Most people will have no choice but to give in, then the practice is implemented everywhere and the price treadmill accelerates.

Bingo. Exactly. In every one of these oligopolies, the most customer-hostile behaviors spread quickly and completely, and any customer-friendly ideas anyone sneaks in fizzle out quickly.

Great example: 15 years ago, assuming you were out of contract, cancelling a postpaid cell phone line worked very differently. Important to know: it was and still is “billed in advance,” meaning you pay around say, January 4, for your service from Jan 4 through Feb 3rd. So if you cancelled your service around Jan 19th, you’d be owed a refund of a half month’s service. 15 years ago, you’d receive a check or a credit to your method of payment - since you didn’t get the service you paid for, that seemed very obviously correct. Sometime at least 10 years ago, one of the cell phone carriers decided to try just saying that you never got a refund, and that if you didn’t want to be ripped off, then you should just cancel on the one day of the month where you had finished using the service you paid for (and hope you didn’t do it too late and get billed for another month). Initially it was just that one carrier who did this, but quickly this became the norm across the whole industry, and now all three postpaid carriers work exactly that way.

This is of course the same story with more well-publicized enshittification, like Basic Economy plane tickets, data caps on your broadband service, etc. etc.


>And if you or your family is hungry, you won't drive around for hours, burning gas, until you find a shop that saves you a few bucks.

Sure, but if you felt you didn't get a good deal you're not going to go back.

Like I personally don't know every single price at every single shop before I go, but I do know for example that Henry's Mercato or the Big Watermelon will have some kind of cheap bulk fruit, Aldi has cheaper staples, Springvale has the best fish etc. etc.

There are plenty of other places I checked out once or twice and then wrote off as a bad deal.


> Sure, but if you felt you didn't get a good deal you're not going to go back.

If you feel that way about all of them, you're not just going to starve to death, though. If you've got two options and they're both bad, you probably just go to one of them anyway.


You've actually got that backwards - being wealthy makes your time and effort worth more (to you) than the half-hour you'd spend price-comparing every item in the cart for each price difference (each between $0.03 and $2.00), while being poor makes price comparisons much more worth it

Being more financially stable means you pay higher prices, in this scenario


Right, which would imply that a VPN that makes you look broke would help get you better prices.

Haha, no no no. I don't trust this to be true. Everyone will pay more or else the investment into this technology doen't break even.

They’ll require ID verification for everything. Like they are normalizing with age verification for social media

Most algorithms doing this charge lower prices to the wealthy since they are more valuable customers.

Total spend is higher. And if your $20 tricket breaks you're less likely to bother to return it if $20 doesn't mean that much to you. Plus other reasons I'm sure.


With the loopholes, stores can raise the baseline prices and give some people coupons for some products.

To avoid this reliably, shop in person at a supermarket that doesn't have a loyalty program.


How’s that gonna work when they know your address?

  Location: San Francisco
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: No
  Technologies: TypeScript/JS, React, node.js, Redis, Postgres, pgvector, LLM agents, Cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure), ci/cd pipelines, other tech
  Résumé/CV: on request
  Email: charles@geuis.com

I don't really understand Anthropic's pricing model.

https://claude.com/pricing

They have individual, enterprise, and API tiers. Some are subscriptions like Pro and Max, others require buying credits.

Say for my use-case I wanted to use Opus or Sonnet with vscode. What plan would I even look at using?


You could use any of the plans depending on your situation.., they will all work in VSCode, so the question is how much usage you need and whether you want to pay for a subscription or directly for usage.

If you’re actually asking this question earnestly, I recommend starting out with the Pro plan ($20).


Copilot, probably?


  Location: San Francisco
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: No
  Technologies: TypeScript/JS, React, node.js, Redis, Postgres, pgvector, LLM agents, Cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure), ci/cd pipelines, other tech
  Résumé/CV: on request
  Email: charles@geuis.com


I'd like a security patch for 18. I have no desire to upgrade to iOS Vista or whatever it is we're calling it


I really hate to say it, but this article in particular needs a tldr. The author does a web recipe take. Don't put the actual factual info upfront and require parsing through everything to find anything important.

Kinda done with this.

If you have something important to say, say it up front and back it up with literature later.


  Location: San Francisco
  Remote: Yes
  Willing to relocate: No
  Technologies: TypeScript/JS, React, node.js, Redis, Postgres, pgvector, LLM agents, Cloud (AWS/GCP/Azure), ci/cd pipelines, other tech
  Résumé/CV: on request
  Email: charles@geuis.com


Ok.

I completely support the sentiment of what you wrote. But it doesn't directly seem relevant to the parent question.


It’s not but it is relevant to the surrounding context as to why this post has made it to the top of HN right now.

Very few of the comments on this thread are actually about the act of canceling the subscription.


Query: Are there any current legal challenges to this rapid spread of age verification that have a chance of hitting the Supreme Court?

From my admittedly poor understand of legal stuff, these are largely proactive measures happening at company and state level. Congress nor Supreme Court have issued any rulings around this yet.


> chance of hitting the Supreme Court?

Why would that matter? The constitution is just a worthless scrap of paper these days


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: