Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more garbagepatch's commentslogin

There's no scrollbar but scrollback works with alt+page_up or scrolling with the mouse wheel or touchpad. They do mention they'll implement scrollback search and scrollbars in 1.3.


> just make a choice

Now you are bikeshedding. Just go with the defaults.


Which defaults? The programming languages I’ve worked with don’t have defaults for everything related to formatting. Editor defaults don’t work, since not everybody uses the same editor. So you have to make a choice somewhere.


A lot of (relatively) recent languages do have defaults. Go and rust both come with an auto formatter out of the box, and defaults that are sane enough to just run with


Ah yeah, in those cases it is possible to just use the defaults. Come to think of it, I have worked with Deno, which comes with a formatter (and linter and testing library) and I’m a fan. Saves a couple of dependencies, some config files and a bit of mental overhead when creating a new project.


I guess the GP means "use an opinionated formatter", I agree with both of you.


Please inform me what the defaults are for Java, C#, C++, C, Bash and Python?


As far as C# goes there's `dotnet format`. You can use it as is or provide an `.editorconfig` file to customize it.


Pressing ' twice places one ' in the search box and then you have to delete it. You can press ' <space> to get the search box empty.


The front end is still react. But I'd be curious to know if LLM's are less prone to errors generating code for strongly typed languages over others like Javascript.


From experience: A static type system is MUCH better for agents than dynamic. I've done a few projects both ways - the agent is just much, much better with the static system because it sees compile errors right away, and also has access to better static analysis tools. I don't know how much the types themselves help the LLM, it's better context but more tokens, but the agent seeing errors is just a huge difference.

It's also much easier for you as a developer to digest the code if you need to refactor because you got lazy and accepted some slop.


In my experience, a massive YES. At least with agenetic models that have an iteration loop, and in languages like Rust where the type system is strong enough to prevent categories of bugs.


I'd like to see the others go for the tech behind the Steamdeck touchpads. That's way better.


Why do cars need a 3D engine? I thought they used Godot for the UI interface while others in the industry use Qt.

Other people seem to be betting on Godot recently, Battlefield 6 has been shown to use it for their map editor and Jetbrains became a sponsor of the project a few days ago.


What is unsupported hardware in this context? Machines without TPM 2.0?


It's not just TPM 2.0, you also need a supported CPU. Everything before Intel 8th gen and Zen+ (including 1st gen Ryzen) is not supported even if you have TPM 2.0


To users: https

To devs: SSL

Did not start working before 1999. Started using Linux in 2003.


It seems to be Zig's equivalent to this part of LLVM: https://llvm.org/docs/GlobalISel/Legalizer.html


No shame in waiting until 1.0. There's other production ready languages you can use right now so you can ignore Zig until then.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: