Just from reading the threads here it seems readily apparent that he then went to start this company that did these bad things. Does not seem confusing at all?

What bad things?

Why shouldn't the court entertain it? If Character is innocent, shouldn't they have the opportunity to have the accusations disproven?

The case is so blatantly frivolous it should have been thrown out. Nobody should have to spend legal fees defending claims that they're responsible for somebody killing themselves over saying "come home to me".

Won't they get those fees back if dismissed or if the plaintiff doesn't prevail?

My understanding is that this is generally not the case in the US.

That would explain much. I'm not a USA citizen.

It's the medium, not the message.

A generous response

Trump sells all sorts of things. Anyone buying any of it is a fool.

I agree. But when the opposition tells you your shitty life will remain shitty in a best case scenario it isn't very inspiring or invigorating which you need to entice people to actually go vote for someone.

Yeah, why not make up a bunch of lies?

Or why not make an actual plan to improve things and solve problems instead of throwing in the towel before you even start?

It also doesn't help to be a prosecuting attorney that extorted poor people for judicial profit. Only the wealthy view prosecutors as good people.

>Or why not make an actual plan to improve things and solve problems instead of throwing in the towel before you even start?

I don't know, you tell me? According to you it's reasonable enough in this scenario.

What has Trump done that makes a meaningful positive difference in the lives of people making less than $250k/year?

I never said he did, I never said I support him or anything he does. But Trump being a complete idiot doesn't make Kamala not shitty and uninspiring to voters.

> But Trump being a complete idiot doesn't make Kamala not shitty and uninspiring to voters

Okay, and? Did anyone even dispute that?

No, its a play on the word roundabouts

This is a bit of a traffic circle way of explaining the joke.

So ... in a roundabout way, it's straight—forward, and in a straightforward way, it's roundabout?

Yeah, I just made the heating elements for the ovens, not the doors!

>You really think if they didn't work there, someone else wouldn't?

What does that have to do with any person's individual morals?

Meta's problem isn't that they "maximize shareholder value" it's how they decided to go about doing it.