Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So breech of copyright = stealing? The RIAA and MPAA were right all along...


I'm going to assume both of you meant "breach" and not "breech" =)

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/breach http://www.thefreedictionary.com/breech


Hence the use of (what is called) "scare quotes".

Note that I put scare quotes inside of scare quotes, because I really disagree with that name. Irony quotes might be a better name, which would allow it to cover all different and separate forms of irony (sarcasm, tragedy, fate, etc).

But that's neither here nor there. The point is, "steal" is in scare quotes meaning it is using a word to express something other than its literal intention.


My thoughts exactly. IMHO, published data cannot - by definition - be stolen. Private data can.


I don't think I'd use the word steal in respect of copyright works. But here it is the moral rights which are being denied.

How do you steal something given to you as a gift? Claim it was yours all along and so deny the owner their attribution. Even if the owner of the copyright retains access to the data you can still deny them their lawful attribution - that is what has arguably been stolen here I think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: